> On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:41:53 Timothy Pearson wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:07:16 Timothy Pearson wrote: >> > >> >> And you will guarantee that the upstream LibreOffice project >> continues >> >> to >> >> build an unmaintained plugin just for us? >> > >> > Once it is not included then fork it. There is no problem right now. >> > >> >> I think it would be better to get a new plugin into LibreOffice before >> the >> KDE3 one is dropped, as this will avoid the whole unpleasantness that >> goes >> along with trying to re-add a dropped component (and many times prevents >> the new component from being included in the upstream project). It >> would >> also minimize the impact to users, who theoretically could end up >> without >> Trinity integration for at least one LibreOffice release cycle. > > You mean you want to write a new plugin? :-\ NO!! > Does it mean you also want to rewrite the styles support, address book > support etc? No, not at all. See my second Email that crossed yours to the list :-) Tim