On Sunday 13 November 2011 04:47:39 you wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2011 00:57:10 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > > >> and a fix to this bug: > > >> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=139 > > > > > > Well and also this one: > > > > > > http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1299175239:2a98648e2c89cbb1265f842903c6370e71f544ae.diff > > > > > > > The common theme is that they are relatively trivial, and especially that > > last one no claim of ownership can really be attached, as the latest > > versions of GCC will demand that exact fix. > > The last link is not correct. I was referring to this patch: > > http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::2088 > Again incorrect link. I was actually referring to this patch: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::2560 Possibly Pearson did not include it.