On Thursday 17 November 2011 04:15:47 pm Sanne wrote:
> On Thursday 17 November 2011, Kate Draven wrote:
> > I agree with everything here, especially about konq, I also live in konq.
> > I do, however, like having konq as a web browser. I feel the html engine
> > should be fixed. Trust me there are some advantages konq has over FF as a
> > web browser.
>
> Nice to know there's a kindred spirit. :)
>
> I'm sure Konqeror can be a nice web browser also, it's just that I sorta
> grew up on Firefox and got very used to its ways and great extensions,
> especially for web development. I don't like the recent change in
> versioning though, and it does feel a bit heavy lately.
That's one of the main reasons we want KHTML replaced/fixed. Konqueror remains
light.
There was a Firefox fork called Flock awhile back. I don't know if it still
exists.
There's also Arora. Chromium/Chrome is becoming popular also.
--
Kristopher Gamrat
Ark Linux webmaster
http://www.arklinux.org/
Attachments: