Martin Gr��lin wrote: > On Saturday 10 December 2011 12:56:07 Nigel Stewart wrote: >> What you're proposing makes sense, on the face of it. And I ask these >> question not as a troll or flame - and not from the perspective of really >> knowing what the KWin component is responsible for: >> >> Is the binary size and performance (desktop latency) going to be >> comparable? >> >> Does it drag in other KDE 4 dependencies? > Obviously it depends on kdelibs and kde-runtime like any KDE application. The > dependencies will of course be better once frameworks 5 are released. > > Considering the impact on a running environment I would say that all depends > whether your users are using any KDE 4 applications or none. I would be > surprised if your users would use no KDE 4 applications. So I think it is > negligible. Some system on which I run TDE are very memory constrained. They have only 128MB maybe 256MB of RAM. On such systems I do not tend to have any KDE 4 applications installed. It's definitely true that window managers are very difficult to maintain. I know that some tests in Wine's test suite were failing on kwin in Trinity because of bugs that had only been fixed in kwin for KDE 4. I wonder how strong the newer kwin series depend on KDE 4 and whether it could be made to compile against Trinity as well. In any case good integration between KDE 4 and Trinity components so they can be mixed already seems good at least for high end systems. Julius