On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:49:01 -0800 (PST) Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote: > > It would not be a giant benefit to users who > > already have loaded the libraries into memory, but it would > > for people who are looking to use Trinity applications as > > stand alone. > > Okay, computer science majors. Quit trying to see who can crow the > loudest. :) > > All I want to know is whether the non gui commands of TDE such as > kwriteconfig and kreadconfig can (easily) be built without the X > overhead. You would either have to: -separate non-X-dependent parts of Qt like for Qt4 -not do that separation but instead use the X functions as weak symbols and add a dlopen() of X libraries to every X-using Qt3 application I really don't see a really easy option; there is a third option which would be to compile both with-X and without-X versions of kdelibs and Qt3 but without significant linker magic it is likely to load both versions of kdelibs and Qt3 within a Trinity session. > > Darrell > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... For additional > commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@... Read > list messsages on the Web archive: > http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to > top-post: > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >