On Sunday 08 January 2012 00:11:15 Darrell Anderson wrote: [...] > > This tells the user exactly what is being built. If > > the user wants something else, he has a basis to determine > > what is missing (or extra) and make the appropriate > > changes. > > Yes, this sounds palatable. As upstream providers we need to test > everything. Right now doing that is cumbersome. > I understand that individual packagers don't want everything enabled. I > don't either, but I am looking at this as an upstream provider and not just > a packager. We can't test everything if most of the features are disabled > by default. Actually I do not understand the problem. If you want to check all features, enable they. -- Serghei