trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] KControl and the confusing mess it has become.

From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:02:54 -0600
On 02/06/2012 10:34 AM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> Calvin, I responded to your request for suggestions toward improving KControl. Let me know when you need help with testing.
> 
> Thanks! It's rather lengthy I need to review each of those ideas.
> Overall they look like valid choices. I like the idea of separating
> peripherals and other customizations. If not it's an 100% agreement,
> maybe a few small details.
> 
> I am going to create a Etherpad with your ideas copied into it. After
> doing my own review I will be asking Trinity users and developers for
> further ideas and modifications.
> 
> Spot on,
> 
> Calvin
> 

Calvin,

  Drop a link to the etherpad. I just googled and found nothing. I agree a small
clean up is in order, but not too much. The kcontrol for 3.5.13 wasn't bad as of
10 months ago or so. I haven't had time to think lately, but I did install, test
and dump 4.8 when released on Arch and system settings was garbage.
3.5.12->3.5.13 was not in too bad of shape, so I want to help with the review to
make sure we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater :)


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.