> On Monday 13 February 2012 14:09:54 Timothy Pearson wrote: >> > On Monday 13 February 2012 21:48:02 Robert Xu wrote: >> >> Can we keep negativity to a minimum and find bugs to fix? Thanks. >> >> One KDE developer/user's attitude does not represent the KDE >> community >> >> as a whole (however influential). >> >> Likewise, one TDE dev/user's attitude doesn't represent the Trinity >> >> community as a whole. >> >> >> >> So please, can we get along? >> >> >> >> *(This is why I try not to participate in threads that could possibly >> >> turn negative :|) >> >> >> >> tl;dr: shut up, let feuds die, get along in peace. don't judge a book >> >> by its cover. >> > >> > +1. Please move this mess somewhere else, there is devel@ list. I'm >> tired >> > to "read" these messages with DELETE button :) >> > >> > -- >> > Serghei. >> >> I am done; I finally got Martin to detail the kwin problems he saw, >> which >> is all I really wanted in the first place. > I gave you detail on only two of many issues. Please don't lie to yourself > that this were the only issues I have seen. >> He also ended up giving us >> some useful information as to the direction of KDE4, specifically that >> they do not consider more mouse clicks to impede productivity. > Again please don't twist my words. You asked for my *personal* experience. > This is what I told you. It has set nothing about whether *they* consider > anything, I even did not say that I would consider anything. Additionaly I > did > not say anything about that this is a *direction of KDE4*. I have nothing > to > do with the development of file management. I am not involved at all. I > have > never contributed to the development. > > I am rather disappointed in seeing my words twisted like that and that in > a > thread called stop it. Very, very disappointing. > > Regards > Martin You use KDE4, and any project tends to morph to fit its current userbase. I don't want to get dragged into another argument; let's focus on twin and kwin, not KDE4, as mentioned in the other thread. Tim