On 21 February 2012 16:51, Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote: >> As long as it doesn't introduce any issues, and as long as >> it can coexist with normal libjpeg, why not compile a >> version for TDE just for the distros/versions that don't >> already have it? > > We should not repackage anything still actively maintained upstream and is not a direct dependency for Trinity. > > Serghei said he would add a detection test to the cmake files. > > One note: if packagers build with libjpeg-turbo installed but downstream users do not have libjpeg-turbo installed, everything should still work. That is, using libjpeg-turbo should be optional in the code but still use the expected default libjpeg libraries when libjpeg-turbo is not installed. > > Darrell it doesn't matter, libjpeg-turbo replaces it. the API the same, code won't break... it's sort of an drop in replacement.:) Calvin