trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: March 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] QT API renaming! Why?!

From: Aleksey Midenkov <midenok@...>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:49:03 +0400
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Serghei Amelian <serghei@...> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2012 10:22:13 Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Serghei Amelian <serghei@...> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> > Yeah, for this reason I forked my own KDE 3.5.10 and started to port it
>> > to cmake (actually this email was composed on kmail 3.5.10 built with
>> > cmake).
>>
>> I saw your cmake code in Trinity. You might want to look at my
>> additions. We should coordinate our efforts.
>
> After stabilization of 3.5.10 cmake port I will publish it on github and I
> will accept patches.
>

You should look at them now before you've already done the same thing.
I don't see good reason for your fork and how do you suppose to
maintain it? Synchronize all the development done in Trinity?

Timothy, you see? People even start forking because of it... :-( I
confirm that I hate this renaming badly too (and there are 1000 good
reasons for that). But more I don't like forks! Forks mean that people
can't negotiate. We must collaborate, but not argue and compete to
each other!!! In condition of lacking manpower this is crucial to the
project!

Maybe we will find the solution which will satisfy everyone?