On 11 March 2012 17:04, Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote:
>> Is this a nice little patch so interesting that I should
>> incorporate it into prepared updates for 3.5.13?
>
> I don't see any reason the patch can't be back ported to 3.5.13. The patch is only two lines.
>
> Darrell
>
>

And my patch  was written based on 3.5.13 sources.

Calvin