trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: April 2012

SUCCESS [was Re: [trinity-devel] rosegarden - gcc47 - need help - probably 5 second fix of "has no member named 'getAsEvent'"]

From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:44:42 -0500
On 04/12/2012 04:01 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 03:59 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 04/11/2012 01:59 PM, /dev/ammo42 wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>>   I have no idea how to chase this error through the stl container,
>>>> etc....
>>>>
>>> getAsEvent here is a static member function of AbstractSet, this is why
>>> this-> doesn't work.
>>> Here getAsEvent(x) can be changed to AbstractSet::getAsEvent(x) (there
>>> is no reference to an actual AbstractSet since the member function is
>>> static). If it still doesn't work (I'm not a template guru...) you can
>>> also try AbstractSet<Element,Container>::getAsEvent(x).
>>>
>>
>>
>> /dev/ammo42
>>
>>   It required the 'AbstractSet<Element,Container>::getAsEvent(x)' type fix and
>> other related fixes to 'this->push_back' to get past the initial errors. It
>> built smoothly after that until it hit (a now very familiar looking)
>> redeclaration error:
>>
> <snip>
>>
>>   That brings rosegarden to the point where my knowledge is exhausted. However,
>> it is on par with the other failures in:
>>
>> tde-kipi-plugins - error: redeclaration of 'TQListViewItemIterator it'
>>
>> tde-tdepim - error: redeclaration of 'TQMap<TQGuardedPtr<KMFolder>,
>> int>::Iterator it'
>>
>> tde-k3b - error: redeclaration of 'K3bAudioEditorWidget::Range* r'
>>
>> digiam - still dead with libpng15 issue.
>>
>>   What is your thought on the redeclaration issue??
>>
> 
> Oops, forgot to attach the patch that got us this far....
> 

OK,

  I have solved the rosegarden build problem by basically backporting the
current rosegarden-11.11.42-gcc-4.7.patch patch to the TDE version. There were
files that didn't exist in our version, so I just used the sourceforge patch as
a guide, but I think I have found all the gcc47 issues in the TDE version.
(which foreshadows quite a bit of tedious work for the remaining TDE apps - not
difficult, just a bit time consuming...)

  I need somebody to signoff and push the patch to the GIT tree. Let me know
what you think.

  If a lawyer can do it, the rest of you coders will have no problem.... ;-)


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Attachments: