>> > When reviewing the source code, sometimes I see Qt:: prefixed and
>> > sometimes TQt::.
>> >
>> > Which is correct? If both are correct then how does one
>> determine appropriate context for each?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Should be TQt::
>
> Then when I find Qt:: in the source code I should patch?

Yes.

> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
> than TQt::?

None really--it's a readability issue only.

Tim