On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@...> wrote: > Timothy Pearson wrote: >>> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather >>> than TQt::? >> >> None really--it's a readability issue only. > > Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using > TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding > patches and so on)? Agree. No reason for extra TQt spreading.