On 04/27/2012 02:30 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
> I have tested some of the patches and they work for me as well. Therefore I am going to start pushing those that I test successfully. (Working for two or more people using different distros is a reasonable litmus test.)
> 
> I mention this here as a friendly warning. :-) That is, if you are building from GIT, please check all resources before posting to the list. That includes doing a git pull to discover whether I pushed a patch.
> 
> I'm even learning. :-) I just created a tdepim patch that needed a this-> pointer. Thanks to all of you who have created similar patches, from which I learned what to do. I don't grasp the whole "this" pointer concept, but I can patch. :-)
> 
> Darrell

Excellent Darrell,

  If you update or improve patches, please post updates to 958. Unless you have
somewhere else you would rather collect them all, I say we just work all gcc47
patches in bug 958 since that is where the collection of patches currently
resides. I have made a point to upload all of the gcc47 patches I have there.

  Also, after you gcc47 builds of tdelibs and tdebase, test the kwrite/kate
lockup issue that is presently 979. That will help rule in or rule out gcc47 as
an issue.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.