> no it doesn't. KWin provides the same level of integration to Trinity as it
> has ever done, whether you call it KWin or TWin or FooBar doesn't change
> the fact that it is afterall KWin. Just for the fun of it, I just searched
> for the term "kicker" in KWin's source code and it still finds 11
> reference.
>
> So no, the question whether TWin or KWin is a completely different one to
> whether TWin or openbox.

Sorry, I still don't get the point. What is the "integretion" you talk about? 
Is there a testcase where you can show the advantage of kwin above any other 
wm? 
As I see it - from a users point of view - the only difference between twin 
and any other wm is the configuration dialog. Is this valid for kwin, too?

Nik