On Wednesday 02 of May 2012 02:18:12 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> Yes, this is correct.  I am waiting to do so until I get an official
> sign-off that the new packages work better than the old ones (i.e. users
> are reporting that the new packages do not crash, etc.).
>
I pause tide of updates, so that users can test. :)

> Honestly I'm not sure how to do this in anything resembling a sane manner
> in GIT.  I was considering distribution of the large patch file as an
> update to the existing 3.5.13 sources, but comments and discussion are
> definitely welcome on this subject!
>
With Git I still do not know how much. But I was in CVS can be tagged branch, 
in which the patches can grow independently of the main branch. I suppose it 
is possible also in the GIT. And so - to separate branch - I thought the 
inclusion of patches for 3.5.13.1 (or how to be named).

> Tim
>
Slavek
--