> On 05/02/2012 08:13 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> That said, I hope you find something soon and that this is NOT a gcc
>> related issue!
>
> Grumble, grumble, grumble -- Uh, Boss... I've got bad news...
>
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Before I chase a wild goose, any chance you can verify with a rebuild of
the latest GIT head on gcc 4.6?

Tim