Le 05/05/2012 02:48, Sl�vek Banko a �crit :
> On Thursday 03 of May 2012 23:51:44 Francois Andriot wrote:
>> The most notable differences are:
>> 1) I have skipped all patches about "QT=>TQT" (or TQT=>QT) renaming,
>> because I thought it was a never-ending work in progress which could
>> cause hard-to-fix regression.
> At the beginning I was not planning to incorporate TQT repairs. But then just
> when such repairs have helped solve various tricky bugs, so I decided to
> incorporate them. The reactions of users of my PPA can assume that the
> boundaries that I set not cause regressions. As I mentioned in earlier mails,
> I have limited the inclusion of the following patches:
>
> -- Remove additional unneeded tq method conversions
> -- Rename obsolete tq methods to standard names
> -- Rename a few stragglers
> -- Fix inadvertent "TQ" changes
>
> If we agree on that, I would incorporate referred patches into all the other
> packages that are not yet included in the update. However it would require
> more time, so I prefer leaving it up to potential further update.
>
>> 2) I absolutely need all GCC 4.7 related patch (I see you have some, but
>> not all of them). This also applies to ruby 1.9 and libpng 1.4/1.5 .
>>
> I understand. For debian and ubuntu's patches are not yet substantial. The
> fact that I have some integrated and some are not, has a simple explanation -
> some patches were in GIT after I released the update. :)
>
>> Also, there are lots of commits by Darell to remove "More applications"
>> from program menu, and neither you nor me have taken them. Maybe we
>> should consider taking them.
> Yes, I thought about them several times. When we think about it both equally,
> so it probably will be a good idea :) We will wait for GIT branch or
> incorporate it again each in yourself?
>
> Slavek
Hello, I've found that the ktorrent patch "bp006-5af9907f.diff" does
not apply correctly because of modified strings in some files
"ktorrent.po": kde-i18n was incorrectly renamed "tde-i18n" . Since it is
part of an email address, it should be reverted.
Anyway, I've had to apply a part of commit #5dcbbbba before bp006 in
order to get it to work.
See attached patch.
Francois
Attachments: