On 06/03/2012 07:59 AM, E. Liddell wrote: > Fedora seems to have been using systemd by default for the last version or two; > I believe they have working Trinity packages. OpenSuSE has one (very minor) > bug filed against the KDE3/systemd combination: > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2011-12/msg01977.html > > Most of what systemd does is likely to be at a level of the system that's lower > than what Trinity needs to concern itself with. systemd/sysv incompatibilities > seem to be mostly at the level of init script syntax, which I don't think we need > to worry about. > > Further reading: > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html , http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC  > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/writing-display-managers  > >  Two slightly different comparisons of currently available Linux startup > systems. While the line items in the first table on each page are almost > identical, it's interesting to see the biases sloshing around. ;) > > Only a concern for us if tdm/kdm was ever integrated with ConsoleKit, which > I don't think it was Thank you E! I was hoping that was the case, but didn't know how the details would work. The only one that caused me concern was tdm. I guess as long as it can get called from inittab or some systemd.service, then tdm really won't care -- just as long as something calls it :) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.