On 06/03/2012 07:59 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
> Fedora seems to have been using systemd by default for the last version or two;
> I believe they have working Trinity packages.  OpenSuSE has one (very minor)
> bug filed against the KDE3/systemd combination:
> http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2011-12/msg01977.html
> 
> Most of what systemd does is likely to be at a level of the system that's lower
> than what Trinity needs to concern itself with.  systemd/sysv incompatibilities
> seem to be mostly at the level of init script syntax, which I don't think we need
> to worry about.
> 
> Further reading:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html , http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC [1]
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/writing-display-managers [2]
> 
> [1] Two slightly different comparisons of currently available Linux startup
> systems.  While the line items in the first table on each page are almost
> identical, it's interesting to see the biases sloshing around. ;)
> 
> [2]Only a concern for us if tdm/kdm was ever integrated with ConsoleKit, which
> I don't think it was

Thank you E!

  I was hoping that was the case, but didn't know how the details would work.
The only one that caused me concern was tdm. I guess as long as it can get
called from inittab or some systemd.service, then tdm really won't care -- just
as long as something calls it :)

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.