On 06/20/2012 08:37 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> After the TQt3 renaming, will it be possible to rebuild TQt3 & TDE with >> Qt4 >> installed. > > That is the intent, and also one of the main reasons for the existence of > TQt3 vs. the original unmodified Qt3. > > Tim > > In the past we provided links to create 'tq....' functionality, what about reversing that logic to now create links to provide 'q....' functionality in the tqt3/bin dir? Seems logical -- will it work? Here is the old way Arch handled this and a new scheme based on the new names: make INSTALL_ROOT="$pkgdir" install <snip> # install link the apps provided by qt3 so we don't collide with # qt4 and can run them. # Old tqt links from before renaming # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/assistant" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqassistant" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/designer" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqdesigner" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/linguist" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqlinguist" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/lrelease" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqlrelease" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/lupdate" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqlupdate" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/moc" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqmoc" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/qmake" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqqmake" # ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/qtconfig" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/tqtconfig" # New links providing old package functionality ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqassistant" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/assistant" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqdesigner" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/designer" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqlinguist" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/linguist" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqlrelease" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/lrelease" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqlupdate" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/lupdate" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqmoc" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/moc" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqmake" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/qmake" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tqtconfig" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/qtconfig" ln -sf "${_prefix}/bin/tquic" "${pkgdir}${_prefix}/bin/uic" Will packages that relied on Qt3 still build if they use the new TQt3 binaries? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.