Message: previous - next
Month: June 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?

From: Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
> > (I'm confused why the preprocessor checks were not needed.)
> They are not needed because the original code in Digikam was
> redundant. The patch simply removed the redundancy!

Ok. You're dealing with a C++ dunce here, remember? I still don't grasp pointers, ->, this, and other C++ related weirdness.

Because both David and I built digikam against libpng 1.5 and 1.4.9 respectively, with the preprocessor check patch, apparently the checks did not cause any harm but are unnecessary.

I guess nice try but I'm still a C++ dunce. :-)