On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:58, Kristopher Gamrat <pikidalto@...> wrote: > 2011/1/7 Ilya Chernykh <neptunia@...> >> >> Also true. Still, I find it that the whole departure to Dolphin in KDE4 >> was far from ideal still. Profile handling well would be better. >> >> >> No doubt. Dolphin is completely unusable. There are just some errors in >> profile handling scripts which should be fixed. Also I noticed that many >> errorsĀ were introduced in KDE3 in final versions such as 3.5.10 while were >> absent previously. Seems like a marketing move to justify scrapping it. >> > What errors are these errors? I haven't used Dolphin extensively, but in the > few times I did use it I did not notice any problems. > > Sorry, I'm going to give in to the KDE 4.6 RC. Dolphin seems to be working much better. (I actually got impressed, which is... amazing.) Konqueror, on the other hand, is still a piece of crap. (why don't they just make rekonq the default and kill konqueror...) Truthfully, I'm using Dolphin for KDE3 (D3olphin, I think it's called) because Konqueror is making me pull hair. but I'm wondering if maybe there could be a ReKonq for kde3? lol. Either that, or we'll wait for tQT to mature for Qt4. -- later, Robert Xu