Message: previous - next
Month: January 2011

Re: Re[2]: [trinity-devel] Browser?

From: Robert Xu <robxu9@...>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 22:16:04 -0500
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:58, Kristopher Gamrat <pikidalto@...> wrote:
> 2011/1/7 Ilya Chernykh <neptunia@...>
>> Also true. Still, I find it that the whole departure to Dolphin in KDE4
>> was far from ideal still. Profile handling well would be better.
>> No doubt. Dolphin is completely unusable. There are just some errors in
>> profile handling scripts which should be fixed. Also I noticed that many
>> errorsĀ  were introduced in KDE3 in final versions such as 3.5.10 while were
>> absent previously. Seems like a marketing move to justify scrapping it.
> What errors are these errors? I haven't used Dolphin extensively, but in the
> few times I did use it I did not notice any problems.

Sorry, I'm going to give in to the KDE 4.6 RC.
Dolphin seems to be working much better. (I actually got impressed,
which is... amazing.)
Konqueror, on the other hand, is still a piece of crap. (why don't
they just make rekonq the default and kill konqueror...)

Truthfully, I'm using Dolphin for KDE3 (D3olphin, I think it's called)
because Konqueror is making me pull hair.
but I'm wondering if maybe there could be a ReKonq for kde3? lol.
Either that, or we'll wait for tQT to mature for Qt4.

later, Robert Xu