On 17 August 2012 17:34, Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf@...> wrote: >> On 17 August 2012 17:14, Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf@...> >> wrote: >>>> On 08/17/2012 03:21 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote: >>>>> I would say instead file a bug report requesting that we port to >>>>> poppler. That's what everyone else uses (and has for quite some time) >>>>> and is designed specifically as a library instead of including xpdf >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't think we can right now. All poppler-qt3 code was dropped from >>>> poppler, >>>> so you can't even build poppler-qt3 anymore. (may not be a total >>>> limitation, but >>>> that limitation is there...) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. >>> >>> Not a problem, we have and maintain poppler-tqt3 (in tdegraphics IIRC). >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> trinity-devel-help@... >>> Read list messages on the web archive: >>> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >>> Please remember not to top-post: >>> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >>> >> >> Or if need be Qt4 integration would resolve that problem anyway. >> >> Calvin > > We want to keep Qt4 out of the core, as Qt4 still suffers from a > performance hit on non-graphics-accelerated and embedded/low power > systems. > > Tim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@... > Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ > Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting > Ok understood - Either way poppler is a good idea. We only use poppler now for afaik the previews for konqueror and other small things, nothing full fledged. Cal