> Tim,
>
> please, can you review the patch
> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=792 for bug 1180?
> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1180
>
> From my point of view is correct. But I do not know if it does not
> interfere with SAK idea?
>
> Slavek

As SAK support is a module and can therefore have its build disabled, your
patch is correct.  There is no sense attempting to talk to a daemon that
is not only not running, but does not even exist on the user's system.

Tim