On Wednesday 22 of August 2012 19:43:47 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > please, can you review the patch
> > http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=792 for bug 1180?
> > http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1180
> >
> > From my point of view is correct. But I do not know if it does not
> > interfere with SAK idea?
> >
> > Slavek
>
> As SAK support is a module and can therefore have its build disabled, your
> patch is correct.  There is no sense attempting to talk to a daemon that
> is not only not running, but does not even exist on the user's system.
>
> Tim
>

Thank you, pushed to GIT

Slavek
--