> Hi all. > > As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style QtCurve. > One > of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected problem > is > the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It > affects > not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case also > TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course > does > not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict > results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'. > > Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll > revert > all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*? > > Slavek > -- I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4; wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with their version? Tim