Message: previous - next
Month: August 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Can I revert TQtCurve names back to QtCurve?

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:14:25 -0500
> Hi all.
> As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style QtCurve.
> One
> of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected problem
> is
> the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It
> affects
> not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case also
> TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course
> does
> not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict
> results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
> Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll
> revert
> all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
> Slavek
> --

I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4;
wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with
their version?