>> Hi all. >> >> As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style >> QtCurve. >> One >> of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected >> problem >> is >> the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It >> affects >> not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case >> also >> TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course >> does >> not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict >> results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'. >> >> Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll >> revert >> all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*? >> >> Slavek >> -- > > I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4; > wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with > their version? > > Tim I should mention that I am not opposed to renaming the classes, I am just wondering if there might be a better name that won't conflict with a different project. Tim