Message: previous - next
Month: August 2016

Re: [trinity-devel] New FTBFS with GCC 6 and C++11 dialect

From: Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:53:00 +0800
On 2016/08/19 03:05 AM, Sl�vek Banko wrote:
> There is generated more hash tables where the 'value' has the meaning 
> specific for each table. The tables, for which two mentioned changes 
> concern, has no other item with the value -1. I dare to say that values 
> even today could not be stored as anything other than -1.
> Any other ideas, suggestions, objections?
> Cheers

I will try to take a look in more detail over the weekend. I will come back on this.