> Hi all.
>
> As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style QtCurve.
> One
> of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected problem
> is
> the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It
> affects
> not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case also
> TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course
> does
> not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict
> results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
>
> Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll
> revert
> all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
>
> Slavek
> --

I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4;
wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with
their version?

Tim