>> Hi all.
>>
>> As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style
>> QtCurve.
>> One
>> of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected
>> problem
>> is
>> the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It
>> affects
>> not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case
>> also
>> TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course
>> does
>> not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict
>> results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
>>
>> Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll
>> revert
>> all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
>>
>> Slavek
>> --
>
> I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4;
> wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with
> their version?
>
> Tim

I should mention that I am not opposed to renaming the classes, I am just
wondering if there might be a better name that won't conflict with a
different project.

Tim