On 05/16/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: > If something seems unusual (e.g. that nastiness you posted above), please > look through the tarball I posted to this thread earlier to see if there > are any patches that may have caused the problem. If so, just let me know > and I will reverse the patch in question. > > Tim > Will do, I haven't had a chance to revisit Qt3 in the past few days. Mickey? (/dev/ammo42) has done a good deal of looking at it. We will have to compare notes and get a good bullet-proof baseline Qt3 setup and see what patches can be added to the svn tree that will work with *all* distributions + gcc46 to minimize the distro specific/x86_64 specific patches and build scripts. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.