Le Tue, 17 May 2011 21:23:42 -0500, "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...> a �crit : > On 05/16/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: > > If something seems unusual (e.g. that nastiness you posted above), > > please look through the tarball I posted to this thread earlier to > > see if there are any patches that may have caused the problem. If > > so, just let me know and I will reverse the patch in question. > > > > Tim > > > > Will do, I haven't had a chance to revisit Qt3 in the past few days. > Mickey? (/dev/ammo42) has done a good deal of looking at it. We will > have to compare notes and get a good bullet-proof baseline Qt3 setup > and see what patches can be added to the svn tree that will work with > *all* distributions + gcc46 to minimize the distro specific/x86_64 > specific patches and build scripts. I did not review the largest patches (one of the Debian ones has a size of 1 MB; for such a size I just count on its Debian/Ubuntu test of time :)).