> On Monday 13 February 2012 10:59:10 Timothy Pearson wrote: >> I have repeatedly asked him for >> the technical reasons that he considers twin changes to have "broken" >> it, >> and I still do not have an answer. > I pointed out to two incorrect commits in my very first mail to this > mailing > list. I have offered several times the help, I have told you that you can > ask > me any question about KWin. And now you complain that I never explained to > you > why the commits have broken KWin? Seriously you had enough time to ask, > and I > had expected that you would ask why it is wrong. > > Cheers > Martin Care to elaborate? I am willing to listen. Your original message was disregarded to some extent as you linked to changes that were made on purpose, and I usually expect people who claim something is wrong to make an attempt at stating *why( they think said something is wrong. Tim