trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: April 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Re: Resolving the TWin/KWin Fork Issue

From: "Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <office@...>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:38:28 +0200
> So to me the question whether openbox or fvwm should be used instead of
> KWin or TWin is just invalid.
No, the question stays unanswerd: Kwin = QT4, TWin = TQt3. So where is the 
point to switching?

> This means the question is what are the advantages of using KWin over TWin.
> Well I'm not going to repeat what I have written in the past [2].
That does not answer the question, either. In fact it puts KWin on par to 
fvwm, openbox etc. as far as it's relation to TDE is concerned.

Nik